Border Patrol Pursuit in Watertown Raises Questions About New York's New Immigration Enforcement Law
By Hans Wilder, Watertown Post
WATERTOWN, N.Y. — Friday morning’s immigration-related incident in Watertown involving federal Border Patrol agents and the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office has sparked a question many New Yorkers may soon be asking:
Can local law enforcement still cooperate with federal immigration authorities under New York’s new immigration enforcement restrictions?
The incident unfolded shortly after 7 a.m. when U.S. Border Patrol agents, assisted by Jefferson County Sheriff’s deputies, pursued multiple individuals through the city. Two suspects were reportedly taken into custody, while another individual initially evaded capture before an extensive search was launched in the Coffeen Street and North Massey Street area.
The operation immediately raised eyebrows because Governor Kathy Hochul recently signed legislation intended to limit cooperation between local law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities.
The law, often referred to as the “Local Cops, Local Crimes” measure, prohibits local governments, police agencies, sheriffs’ departments, and corrections facilities from entering into so-called 287(g) agreements that effectively turn local officers into immigration enforcement agents.
Supporters say the law keeps local police focused on local crime. Critics argue it could hamper cooperation with federal authorities.
But Friday’s incident highlights a legal gray area.
The law specifically targets civil immigration enforcement and cooperation agreements associated with ICE. It does not explicitly prohibit local law enforcement from assisting U.S. Customs and Border Protection or the U.S. Border Patrol during active law enforcement operations, fugitive searches, public safety incidents, or criminal investigations.
In other words, while Jefferson County deputies cannot simply become ICE agents under state law, there appears to be nothing preventing them from assisting Border Patrol agents who are actively pursuing suspects through city streets.
That distinction may prove significant.
Jefferson County sits less than 40 miles from the Canadian border and has long been part of a region where Border Patrol maintains an active presence. Smuggling cases, illegal border crossings, human trafficking investigations, and fugitive pursuits often involve multiple agencies working together.
Whether Albany intended to create a distinction between ICE operations and Border Patrol operations remains unclear.
Critics of the new law argue that federal agencies could continue to receive local assistance through Border Patrol-led operations, effectively preserving many of the same cooperative relationships that existed before the legislation.
Supporters counter that helping secure a perimeter during a pursuit is far different from having local officers perform immigration enforcement duties themselves.
At the moment, no evidence suggests Jefferson County deputies violated state law during Friday’s operation. Based on publicly available information, deputies appear to have assisted federal agents during an active pursuit rather than conducting immigration enforcement on their own.
Still, as immigration policy increasingly collides with public safety concerns along New York’s northern border, Friday’s incident may be one of the first real-world tests of where Albany’s new restrictions end and traditional law enforcement cooperation begins.
One thing is certain: in Jefferson County, where the international border is part of daily life, this debate is unlikely to go away anytime soon.
About the Author
