Gov. Kathy Hochul’s one-year moratorium on certain hyperscale data-center permits is portrayed as cutting New York off from the investment, infrastructure and technological future already racing ahead elsewhere.
A one-year pause may help New York write better rules. But if Albany turns that pause into another excuse for paralysis, the technology, investment and future will simply go someplace else.
WATERTOWN POST EDITORIAL
Watertown, N.Y. — By Hans Wilder
There was a time when Americans looked toward the horizon and saw the atomic age approaching.
They were frightened—and understandably so.
The splitting of the atom produced the possibility of almost unimaginable destruction. Nuclear weapons were terrifying, dangerous and deeply unpopular. Nobody with any sense wanted cities wiped from the map. Nobody particularly enjoyed air-raid sirens, backyard fallout shelters or schoolchildren being taught to hide beneath wooden desks as though plywood had suddenly become kryptonite.
But the atomic age had arrived. The Soviet Union was not going to abandon nuclear weapons simply because Americans found them unpleasant. Under the circumstances of that time, the United States had to confront the reality of the Cold War, build its own deterrent and maintain technological superiority.
That was not a cheerful decision. It was reality.
Americans have always had a complicated relationship with progress. We fear it, complain about it, ridicule it and then organize our lives around it.
Today, people complain that everyone has a face buried in a phone. Fair enough. Before smartphones, however, commuters had their faces buried in newspapers on subways and trains. Apparently, staring silently at a folded copy of The Watertown Daily Times was a noble intellectual exercise, while staring silently at a phone is the collapse of Western civilization.
The device changes. Human nature does not.
Which brings us to the elephant in the room: artificial intelligence, the massive computing infrastructure required to support it and Governor Kathy Hochul’s decision to impose a temporary statewide moratorium on new hyperscale data centers.
On July 14, 2026, Hochul signed Executive Order 62, placing certain pending state permits for new or expanded data centers on hold while New York develops a Generic Environmental Impact Statement and a broader regulatory framework. The process may continue for as long as one year. Applications already deemed complete by the Department of Environmental Conservation are not swept into the same hold.
Let us begin by acknowledging that one year is not eternity.
New York does need clear standards. Communities should not be expected to negotiate billion-dollar technical projects while armed with a zoning handbook written when the most sophisticated machine in town was a fax machine. Albany says the pause will be used to examine electricity demand, water consumption, water quality, air quality, noise and effects on surrounding communities. The state also intends to develop guidelines helping municipalities negotiate infrastructure improvements, workforce commitments and direct community benefits.
That work is reasonable.
The danger is what New York usually does after announcing that it is going to “study” something.
It studies. It appoints a commission. The commission schedules listening sessions. The listening sessions produce a report. The report recommends another report. Three governors later, somebody discovers the paperwork in a filing cabinet in Albany, next to the plans for flying cars and an on-time train to Buffalo.
The future, meanwhile, moves to Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, Virginia—or Canada.
Data centers have earned some of their bad reputation. They can be enormous. They can consume extraordinary amounts of electricity and water. Poorly planned facilities may produce persistent noise, industrial lighting, traffic and little immediate visual benefit to the surrounding community. New York reported nearly 12 gigawatts of proposed data-center load in the state’s interconnection queue as of May 2026, demonstrating that this is not some theoretical development that might arrive in 2047. It is already standing at the door.
But those concerns are not arguments for pretending data centers can be wished out of existence.
They are arguments for competent local government.
Local leaders must establish setbacks, landscaping requirements, noise limits, water-use standards, architectural guidelines, road agreements and enforceable community-benefit packages. Developers should pay for the infrastructure they require. Communities should capture meaningful tax revenue rather than surrendering the store through automatic exemptions negotiated behind closed doors.
A major data center should not resemble a prison dropped into the middle of farmland. With proper requirements, it can be screened, landscaped and maintained. Its support infrastructure can strengthen local roads, electrical systems, emergency services, broadband and water facilities. Its tax contribution can support schools and reduce pressure on homeowners.
That is where leadership comes in.
Government’s job is not merely to say no. Any toddler can do that, usually while lying on the floor of a supermarket.
Government’s job is to say: Here are the conditions. Here is what you must build. Here is what you must pay. Here is how the public benefits.
President Donald Trump’s administration has taken the opposite strategic approach from Albany. His July 2025 executive order made the rapid development of major AI data centers and their supporting energy infrastructure a federal priority tied to national security, manufacturing and American technological leadership.
In March 2026, leading technology companies signed the administration’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge. Under that commitment, participating companies agreed to build, bring or buy the new power required by their data centers, pay for necessary delivery and grid upgrades and prevent those costs from being dumped onto ordinary households. The pledge also calls for local hiring, workforce development and investment in host communities.
That is the model New York should be strengthening—not stopping.
Make the companies generate or procure additional power. Make them fund the transmission upgrades. Make them pay whether their projected demand fully materializes or not. Make them provide backup capacity that can support the community during emergencies. Make them contribute to roads, schools, training programs and local public safety.
Then issue the permit and start building.
The Watertown Post does not support covering Northern New York with industrial-scale wind turbines and acre after acre of solar panels. A few rooftop panels, a household system, a small community installation or even a wind turbine serving a limited development is one thing. Transforming enormous stretches of rural landscape into permanent industrial energy zones is something else entirely.
A compact, properly designed data-center campus with dedicated, reliable power generation is a far better use of a controlled industrial site than scattering thousands of acres of intermittent energy infrastructure across farmland and scenic countryside.
Modern nuclear energy, natural gas, hydroelectric power and other dependable generation should all be on the table. This is infrastructure, not a theological debate.
The patriotic reason for getting this right is also the most important one: the United States cannot surrender artificial-intelligence dominance to China.
AI is no longer merely a clever device that writes birthday poems and tells people how long to cook chicken. It is becoming part of military planning, medicine, logistics, engineering, manufacturing, intelligence analysis, finance, communications and scientific research.
The nation that controls the most advanced computing systems will possess enormous economic and strategic power.
China is not going to declare a one-year timeout because New Yorkers are nervous about humming noises.
Northern New York should understand this better than most places. We live beside Fort Drum. We understand that national defense requires land, infrastructure, electricity, transportation and long-term planning. We also understand what happens to communities that lose their economic foundation.
The North Country desperately needs a stronger tax base. It needs investment that cannot be replaced by another convenience store, another dollar shop or another government-funded study telling us that the economy needs improvement.
Without new industry, technology and taxable development, the alternative is not some untouched pastoral paradise where everyone sells handmade candles and lives happily ever after.
The alternative is decline.
It is more empty buildings. More families leaving. More homeowners carrying the tax burden. More poverty. More people pushing shopping carts through Watertown—not because shopping carts are the latest transportation innovation, but because those carts contain everything they own.
That is the real choice before us.
A one-year pause can be defensible if New York uses every day of it to produce predictable, pro-growth rules that protect ratepayers and empower communities.
But if this becomes another Albany burial ceremony—another method of delaying decisions until investors disappear—New York will suffer.
The data centers will still be built. Artificial intelligence will still advance. America will still require immense computing power. China will continue competing for technological dominance.
The only question is whether New York will participate in that future or watch it travel down Interstate 81 toward a state smart enough to open the door.
Progress does not require permission to exist.
It merely decides where it is welcome.
About the Author
